Would like your impressionable teenager to sleep in a tent with a homosexual?

Hey parents!  Do you want your teenage son to be camping with a scout leader who likes boys?  As in “likes boys A LOT?”

Look at what the Boy Scouts of America do:

They’re a private, non-profit organization that keeps THOUSANDS of kids off the street and focuses them on activities that make them productive members of society.

They teach kids to be self-sacrificing for the good of their community.

They teach kids to be honorable.

Why is it that so many are trying to force the scouts to accept (read: endorse) homosexuals within their ranks?

Sad that the Philadelphia city council is trying to jack around the scouts because the scouts won’t subscribe to endorsing a homosexual lifestyle.

Let’s just call it for what it is: Extortion.

 As a refresher for those who may not understand the meaning of the term:

Extortion:  the act of getting money, etc. by threats, misuse of authority, etc.:  sometimes applied to the exaction of too high a price

In 1927 the scouts were granted permission to use Philadelphia city property for the sum total of $1 per year …. the permission was to be indefinite.  Specifically, “in perpetuity.” As in FOREVER.

But now, because the scouts won’t endorse a homosexual lifestyle, the city is voiding their agreement and jacking up the price to $200,000 per year.

Can we find a comparison?

To get a clearer perspective on this, it’s always good to find a parallel comparison.  But on something as emotionally charged as someone’s sexual drive, it’s a bit tough.  So engage your BRAIN and think for a minute:

1. The city charges the private non-profit (PNP) boy scouts an inexpensive ‘rent’ of $1-per-year.  But because the PNP scouts don’t believe they should endorse homosexuality, the city wants to jack up the scouts’ rent to $200,000-per-year.

2. A food bank is also a private non-profit. What if a community had a vegetarian food bank?  First of all, would it make sense for the local beef farmers to sue them because the food bank was discriminating against the consumption of beef? 

Second, if the city were providing $1-per-year ‘rent’ to this PNP vegetarian food bank, should the city up the rent to $200,000-per-year just because the food bank doesn’t want to carry beef products?

Thinking differently

Much talk has been offered on BOTH sides of the homosexual issue regarding genetics.  Pro-homosexual arguments say it both ways:

a) It’s not genetic, I’m just a homosexual. Why can’t you just accept me the way I am?

b) It’s genetic — God made me this way — so how can you not accept me?

Those who believe homosexuality is wrong (quoting the biblical reference “It is an abomination”) also take both views, but for different reasons.

a) He’s chosen the homosexual lifestyle, and it’s wrong.

b) It’s genetic, and it is therefore an illness.

Let’s consider the last statement: What if homosexuality IS genetic? If so, couldn’t it be an illness?

Think of it this way: When a person is born with a congenital birth defect, don’t we try to fix it?

For example, the congenital birth defect Patent Ductus Arteriosus occurs when the shunt connecting the pulmonary artery and the aortic arch fails to close after birth. When this happens, the infant can experience shortness of breath and cardiac arrhythmia — and can end up with the child experiencing congestive heart failure if uncorrected.

The good news?  It’s totally treatable!

Now, name ANY genetic defect that you wouldn’t fix if it were fixable.

My point is this:

“IF” homosexuality were genetic

and

“IF” it is an illness

Wouldn’t you want it fixed?

Consider other genetic conditions:

Let’s say you knew of a man who was ADHD and had Tourette’s syndrome as well as Asberger’s syndrome. His recurring thought, as observed with people who have this combination of genetic conditions, is quite probably “hurt people. Choke them to death.”

These are genetic issues! Would you let your teenage son sleep in the same tent with this man on a weekend camping trip?  Would you want such a man leading a scout troop?  Would you even let the same person in your home to visit alone with your child?

Now, use your brain (and leave your libido out of it):

If homosexuality is genetic, would you really want a homosexual person sleeping with your impressionable teenage son in a tent?

All medical possibilities aside

Let’s even take the genetic possibilities out of the picture.  Most homosexuals (not all, but an overwhelming MOST), by their own admission, enjoy multiple partners. Therefore, they do not subscribe to an “honor” code. In fact, such behavior is not self-sacrificing, it is self-indulgent.

This alone goes against what the private, non-profit scouting organization stands for.

Why would any vegetarian food bank bring someone into their leadership (and example-setting / decision-making) ranks who encourages people to eat meat?

You wouldn’t expect a city to force a PNP vegetarian food bank to bring those people into its fold. And neither should they do the same to the Boy Scouts of America.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Christianity, Culture, Life, News, Rants, Religion, Thoughts

5 responses to “Would like your impressionable teenager to sleep in a tent with a homosexual?

  1. The bigger picture is that no government should be funding ANY non-profit agency that it does not oversee.

    NONE. Spending tax dollars to support an agency that I (or anyone else) may disagree with is wrong.

    ALL funding of non-profit organizations should stop.

  2. i would like to think that most responsible enough to be scout leaders would be responsible enough to avoid issue-prone situations. An additional tent is not that hard to include. I know of several gay persons who avoid using open locker rooms at gyms for example, because they know that it may make others uncomfortable at best, or turn into a huge mess at worst.
    They shouldn’t be forced to include, but I think much more of an issue is being made as to how much of an impact it would make if they did. (And, realistically, they probably always have included unknowingly, those who chose their public actions respectfully to the view of others)

  3. wow…I don’t think that a gay person is sick or wrong. I might not agree with their life and the way they live it. But what they do hind colse door in their homes and bedrooms has nothing to do with me. ANd just because some is gay doesn’t make them LOVE BOYS…it would be like you saying that a person not gay will sleep with you teenage girl…not true. There are just sick people out there that do sick things and it has nothing to do with who or what they are sleeping with.

  4. Lave Sus Manos

    If GoingLikeSixty believes it wrong when a non-profit receives tax money and is not overseen by the gov’t, then, by the same logic, all grants of funding to the ARTS is wrong, too, eh?

    And where in the story does it state the city is giving them tax dollars? They have a long standing agreement to charge them a dollar a year. The agreement is not to shell out a bunch of tax dollars.

    In the story, it talks about the city charging “fair market value” for the space. I personally think it’s wrong for cities to act like landlords — or slum lords.

    Blueraindrop believes “MOST” responsible enough to be a scout leader . . . I love it when people assume we’ll interpret the phrase “Most people…” to mean “all people.”

    What about the one, or the two, or three, or dozens who aren’t part of “most people?”

    The guys who AREN’T responsible enough. The guys who LIKE boys. The guys who KNOW they can stay under cover [aka in the closet] and use their leadership position to slowly stalk their way into those kids’ pants?

    Just like all these “responsible” elementary school teachers who are bedding down 14 and 15 year olds.

    Oh yeah … I also love the “I know of several gay people who …” part. Surely you don’t think that “several” is a valid statistical sample that represents all homosexuals.

    As for Scott Rose, nowhere do I say that someone who is homosexual automatically loves boys.

    But I do offer the idea that WHAT IF it were genetic — like Down’s Syndrome, or any other genetic disorder? The medical community refers to “chromosomal abnormalities” as disorders. AKA Not Normal.

    Inherited genetic disorders, such as Huntinton’s disease, Down’s syndrome, Sickle Cell disease, Hemophelia, and even color blindness, are all situations that people would want corrected if it were possible to do so.

    Our problem? The homosexual lobby is so strong that is WAY politically incorrect to refer to homosexuality as a disorder.

    One of the key point in my original post on this, is not that homosexuality IS a disorder, but WHAT IF it is?

    For the safety of all concerned, color blind people — a genetic disorder — are automatically disqualified from flying military aircraft.

    So IF homosexuality were a genetic disorder, I think it perfectly reasonable to disqualify them from being scout leaders —- especially since the scouts are a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION!!!!!!

  5. Pingback: What can the homosexual lobby say about this? « Op-Ed Central

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s