Monthly Archives: March 2008

You don’t want to laugh

Has anyone reading this actually seen the 16-minute video entitled Fitna?  If not, you need to.  (At the time of this writing, you can still view it on this page.)

While the West is reciting it’s parrot immitation “Islam is a religion of peace,” we have the Quran and it’s followers proclaiming death to all who do not turn to Islam.

It’s like, “You better start reciting the line that Islam is a religion of peace or we’re going to kill you.”

If you say this is an over-reaction, you seriously have your head up inside a dark cavity looking for your last meal.  Pull it out. Look.  Listen.

The Free Speech You Have Now Will Be Gone

 Do you really believe that once Islam controls a geographical area that they let “non-believers” continue their free speech?  On the contrary.  Those non-Islamic bleeeding hearts who currently support Islam will be killed.

 Oh, that it were not that way, but it is.  Every woman, every Christian, every homosexual, every Buddhist, every independent thinker — everyone! — Every non-Muslim will be forced to convert to Islam or be killed.

Believe me, those of us foretelling this do NOT want to laugh when it happens to say “we told you so.” 

Instead, we will certainly cry.  The freedom our parents, our grandparents, and our great-grandparents fought so hard to achieve will disappear simply because of a misguided view of tolerance. 

The TRUE Meaning of Tolerance

In a true sense of of tolerance, we certainly tolerate people who have differing views. But when it comes to how we defend and protect freedom, we draw a boundary and say “this is our policy; this is our Constitution – you shall not change it.”  And it’s because the Constitution guarantees tolerance that we defend it so fiercely.

How can it be inflammatory to Muslims if we simply cite their own religious book and play videos of what their Imams are saying (that those who are not Muslim shall and ought be killed)?  What kind of twisted logic agrees it’s inflammatory to a group to quote what the group believes?

 The misguided tolerance, kind. 

Believe me people – you do not want to laugh.  Draw a boundary. Stand up, or you shall surely be cut down. 

Again — if you’ve not yet seen the video, do so here.


Leave a comment

Filed under Christianity, Culture, Current Events, Islam, Media, Religion

In honor of Barak Hussein ‘Ears’ O’bama’s grandmama, we need a ‘typical white person’s’ blog

What do you say?  If the frontrunner for the Democrats’ nominee for President of the United States is free to talk about his grandmother as a “Typical White Person,” the same language should be free for all of us to use. 

And a “typical white person” ought to have a “typical white person” blog to visit and read opinions about what “typical white people” think.

 You can’t tell me it’s racist!  The black candidate for President of the United States, who, of course, could NEVER be racist if he has reached such a pinacle, has legitimized the term!

Someone was thinking — the domain “” is now taken. And isn’t it great that capitalism thrives, because, .biz, .tv, .us, .info, are all taken now, too.

Perhaps will sell white supremacy materials. God, I hope not.  No race is superior to another.  But I do think we should follow the lead set forth by Barak Hussein ‘Ears’ O’bama and make sure the views of the typical white person are known.

Wouldn’t you agree that the best way to do that is let typical white people comment on a typical white person’s blog?  I think it would be a great way to honor the Democratic frontrunner’s grandmother.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Current Events, Humor, Media, News, Politics

Wondering if I’m a “typical” white person . . .

Barak Hussein “Ears” O’bama has commented that his grandmother is a “typical white person.”  Hmmmm.

Here’s my question: If it’s okay for a ‘black’ person to refer to a white person as a “typical” white person, is it okay for a ‘white’ person to refer to a black person as a “typical” black person?

Or would that be a double standard?

Or maybe even racist?

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Current Events, Government, News, Politics

Top Stories – the News in Review:

Top Story #1:  The pundits are justifying their jobs by scuffling about who has more votes “at the moment,” – McCain, or either of the socialists.  In other words, if the election were held today, who would win?

Who cares? Does any of that affect the way a person is going to vote?  If people throw their vote behind a candidate just because more people are voting for that person, it becomes the most shallow of popularity contests — not a debate about the issues.

 Not that there’s much difference to debate anyway.  McCain isn’t that far off from his socialist opponents.   See my previous post.

Top Story #2:  The Ruskies are bemoaning the actions of the US as taking us back to the cold war, yet which planes are doing recon so close to our Navy ships? Russian Bombers.  This isn’t to say that GWB doesn’t have his head up his ass, it’s just if you’re going to denounce somebody for doing something, don’t go doing the same thing.

Oh, I forgot. That’s the way of the world, isn’t it?  Accuse other people of doing the same crap YOU’RE doing, so it takes the spotlight off of you.

Top Story #3: In the ongoing farce of attempts at Middle East peace, we have a set of Arab ministers mulling over a peace plan with Israel.  Um, hey – you Arab ministers — I shouldn’t have to remind you, but haven’t you sworn to eliminate the nation of Israel?  Why waste our time with this talk of peace? We are long past your antics of waving this false hope in the wind. 

Hilarious, though, how the minnions swallow it up.  “Oh – there’s hope again!”


Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Current Events, Media, News, Politics, Rants